New global marine gravity model from CryoSat-2 and Jason-1 reveals buried tectonic structure
By David T. Sandwell, R. Dietmar Müller, Walter H. F. Smith, E. Garcia, R. Francis. Science, 2014
1,464 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geophysics, Molecular Biology, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/351dd280690bf41169d08dd00a679429fb640b6b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geophysics
- D. Bassett
- Anthony B. Watts
- Brook Tozer
- H. Harper
- Walter H. F. Smith
- David T. Sandwell
- R. Dietmar Müller
- Michael Gurnis
In Molecular Biology
- D. Bassett
- Anthony B. Watts
- Brook Tozer
- H. Harper
- David T. Sandwell
- Walter H. F. Smith
- R. Dietmar Müller
- Michael Gurnis
In Oceanography
Citations in the corpus
- Gravity anomalies, crustal structure, and seismicity at subduction zones: 1. Seafloor roughness and subducting relief (2015, methodology): “Global grids of bathymetry [IOC, 2003] and free-air gravity anomalies [Sandwell and Smith, 2009; Sandwell et al., 2014] are the only data sets uniform in resolution across all subduction zones, but it is often difficult to identify short-wavelength structure within the high gravimetric and…”
- GPlates: Building a Virtual Earth Through Deep Time (2018, background): “…al., 2016), as well as the color rasters of elevation (Amante & Eakins, 2009; Figure 1a), free air gravity anomalies and vertical gravity gradients (Sandwell et al., 2014), Bouguer and isostatic gravity anomalies (Balmino et al., 2012), magnetic anomalies without directional gridding from sea fl…”
- Quantum technology for military applications (2021, background): “Examples of the current spatial resolution are about 100 km [217] for satellite-borne gravity gradiometer or 16 km [218] additional width using radar satellite altimetry (for sea areas), or 5 km [219] for airborne gravimetry.”
- Gravity field recovery from geodetic altimeter missions (2019, methodology): “The V18 vertical deflections were based on only retracked ERS-1 and Geosat/GM data (Sandwell and Smith, 2009) while V23 also included 42 months of retracked CryoSat-2 data and 14 months of retracked Jason-1/GM data, and 2 years of Envisat 35day repeat data (Sandwell et al., 2014).”