Domestic Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Multilevel Venue Shopping in Four EU Member States

By J. Beyers, Bart. Kerremans. 2012

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/351cb042df9e9f6f0528bb6fa7bf044175bbaec4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Gemma Mateo
2. Andreas Dür
3. J. Beyers
4. Caelesta Braun
5. Lisa Lechner

In Public Administration

1. Gemma Mateo
2. Andreas Dür
3. J. Beyers
4. Caelesta Braun

In Strategy and Management

1. Gemma Mateo
2. Andreas Dür
3. J. Beyers
4. Caelesta Braun

Citations in the corpus

• Who lobbies the European Union? National interest groups in a multilevel polity (2012, background): “While in recent years an increasing number of studies has been written on the EU lobbying activities of national associations (Beyers 2002; Beyers and Kerremans 2012; Constantelos 2007; Eising 2009; Greer et al. 2008; Klüver 2010; Richardson 2000), only a few of them address the question of…”
• Ties that count: explaining interest group access to policymakers (2013, background): “While outside lobbying and media strategies are certainly important, direct access to policymakers seems to count most in influencing public policy (Kollman 1998; Bouwen 2002; Beyers 2004; Binderkrantz 2005, 2008; Kriesi et al. 2007; Baumgartner et al. 2009).”
• Legislative lobbying in context: towards a conceptual framework of interest group lobbying in the European Union (2015, unknown): “In line with the so-called ‘compensation hypothesis’, it is often argued that additional lobbying venues provided by the EU are especially attractive to interest groups that gain little influence at the domestic level (Beyers and Kerremans 2012; Eising 2007; Kriesi et al .”