SURVEYING THE AGENTS OF GALAXY EVOLUTION IN THE TIDALLY STRIPPED, LOW METALLICITY SMALL MAGELLANIC CLOUD (SAGE-SMC). II. COOL EVOLVED STARS

By M. Boyer, S. Srinivasan, J. V. Loon, I. Mcdonald, M. Meixner, Dennis Zaritsky, K. Gordon, F. Kemper, B. Babler, M. Block and 10 more. 2011

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We investigate the infrared (IR) properties of cool, evolved stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), including the red giant branch (RGB) stars and the dust-producing red supergiant (RSG) and asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars using observations from the Spitzer Space Telescope Legacy program entitled “Surveying the Agents of Galaxy Evolution in the Tidally Stripped, Low Metallicity SMC,” or SAGE-SMC. The survey includes, for the first time, full spatial coverage of the SMC bar, wing, and tail regions at IR wavelengths (3.6–160 μm). We identify evolved stars using a combination of near-IR and mid-IR photometry and point out a new feature in the mid-IR color–magnitude diagram that may be due to particularly dusty O-rich AGB stars. We find that the RSG and AGB stars each contribute ≈20% of the global SMC flux (extended + point-source) at 3.6 μm, which emphasizes the importance of both stellar types to the integrated flux of distant metal-poor galaxies. The equivalent SAGE survey of the higher-metallicity Large Magellanic Cloud (SAGE-LMC) allows us to explore the influence of metallicity on dust production. We find that the SMC RSG stars are less likely to produce a large amount of dust (as indicated by the [3.6] − [8] color). There is a higher fraction of carbon-rich stars in the SMC, and these stars appear to reach colors as red as their LMC counterparts, indicating that C-rich dust forms efficiently in both galaxies. A preliminary estimate of the dust production in AGB and RSG stars reveals that the extreme C-rich AGB stars dominate the dust input in both galaxies, and that the O-rich stars may play a larger role in the LMC than in the SMC.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/351b337bce8097683c3e32d30d9836055b4d56b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. C. Conroy
  2. Benjamin D. Johnson
  3. Michela Mapelli
  4. A. Bressan
  5. A. Leroy
  6. Dennis Zaritsky
  7. Mark R. Krumholz
  8. A. Bolatto

In Instrumentation

  1. C. Conroy
  2. Benjamin D. Johnson
  3. A. Bressan
  4. Dennis Zaritsky
  5. J. J. Dalcanton
  6. L. Girardi
  7. Aaron Dotter
  8. Michela Mapelli

Citations in the corpus