BULGE n AND B/T IN HIGH-MASS GALAXIES: CONSTRAINTS ON THE ORIGIN OF BULGES IN HIERARCHICAL MODELS

By T. Weinzirl, S. Jogee, S. Khochfar, A. Burkert, J. Kormendy. 2008

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We use the bulge Sérsic index n and bulge-to-total mass ratio (B/T) to explore the fundamental question of how bulges form. We perform two-dimensional bulge–disk–bar decomposition on H-band images of 143 bright, high-mass (M⋆ ⩾ 1.0 × 1010M☉) low-to-moderately inclined (i < 70°) spirals. Our results are as follows. (1) Our H-band bar fraction (∼58%) is consistent with that from ellipse fits. (2) 70% of the stellar mass is in disks, 10% in bars, and 20% in bulges. (3) A large fraction (∼69%) of bright spirals have B/T⩽ 0.2, and ∼76% have low n ⩽ 2 bulges. These bulges exist in barred and unbarred galaxies across a wide range of Hubble types. (4) About 65% (68%) of bright spirals with n ⩽ 2 (B/T ⩽ 0.2) bulges host bars, suggesting a possible link between bars and bulges. (5) We compare the results with predictions from a set of ΛCDM models. In the models, a high-mass spiral can have a bulge with a present-day low B/T⩽ 0.2 only if it did not undergo a major merger since z ⩽ 2. The predicted fraction (∼ 1.6%) of high-mass spirals, which have undergone a major merger since z ⩽ 4 and host a bulge with a present-day low B/T ⩽ 0.2, is a factor of over 30 smaller than the observed fraction (∼66%) of high-mass spirals with B/T ⩽ 0.2. Thus, contrary to common perception, bulges built via major mergers since z ⩽ 4 seriously fail to account for the bulges present in ∼66% of high mass spirals. Most of these present-day low B/T ⩽ 0.2 bulges are likely to have been built by a combination of minor mergers and/or secular processes since z ⩽ 4.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3515827f7139d35edbf55c61eddcc7c79c12fd8a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. R. Somerville
  4. R. Dav'e
  5. Thomas J. Cox
  6. Volker Springel
  7. A. Dekel
  8. Christopher J. Conselice

Citations in the corpus