Jena: implementing the semantic web recommendations
By J. Carroll, Ian Dickinson, C. Dollin, D. Reynolds, A. Seaborne, K. Wilkinson. WWW Alt. '04, 2004
1,189 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3512b8e6ec985ba204483ffd4115c3010b5df54c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Bernardo Cuenca Grau
- Olaf Hartig
- M. Tamer Özsu
- Bijan Parsia
- Evren Sirin
- Aditya Kalyanpur
- Khuzaima S. Daudjee
- Günes Aluç
In Information Systems
- Bernardo Cuenca Grau
- Olaf Hartig
- M. Tamer Özsu
- Bijan Parsia
- Evren Sirin
- Khuzaima S. Daudjee
- Günes Aluç
- Ian Horrocks
Citations in the corpus
- Relationships and data sanitization: a study in scarlet (2010, neutral): “The Jena Semantic Web Framework [26] may be useful; however, as a framework it is not as extensible.”
- Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist: Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL (2011, neutral): “[Carroll et al. 2004] J. J. Carroll, I. Dickinson, C. Dollin, D. Reynolds, A. Seaborne and K. Wilkinson.”
- Hexastore: sextuple indexing for semantic web data management (2008, neutral): “However, systems such as the FORTH RDF Suite [8, 9], Redland [11], Sesame [17], 3store [25, 26], Jena [46, 19, 45], DLDB [39], KAON [44], RStar [36], Oracle [20], and rdfDB [22] utilize a traditional relational databases or Berkeley DB as their underlying persistent data store [38].”
- Diversified Stress Testing of RDF Data Management Systems (2014, background): “While earlier triplestores followed this approach [8,9], it has been demonstrated that maintaining redundant copies with different sort orders and indexes can be much more effective [19].”
- Ontology Matching (2007, neutral): “95 and (ii) the Jena reasoner (Carroll et al. 2004) to infer further correspondences based on ontology structures and available alignments.”
- Advancing translational research with the Semantic Web (2007, neutral): “In SWAN, personal and public knowledgebases are structured as RDF triple stores manipulated by the Jena framework [82].”
- The OWL API: A Java API for OWL ontologies (2011, neutral): “The OWL API, however, takes abstraction to the level of axioms, which is a somewhat higher level of abstraction than a triple based abstraction provided by APIs such as Jena.”
- Semantic Wikipedia (2006, neutral): “We compared the runtime of the SQL queries on SMW’s MySQL database with the time needed to answer the corresponding SPARQL queries on four RDF storage implementations: Jena in-memory, Jena on an embedded Apache Derby DB [6], Sesame2 in-memory, and Sesame2 native b-tree [5].”
- Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner (2007, background): “Pellet supports the standard array of derivative queries and various reasoner management services both via its own API and by supplying bindings and support for common toolkits (such as Jena [5], WonderWeb OWL API [6] and DIG [4], see Section 3 for details).”