Alternative back contact materials for thin film Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells

By K. Orgassa, H. Schock, J. Werner. 2003

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3502ae6885f8460553e28fae96a0096cbe291be3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Martin A. Green
2. David B. Mitzi

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. X. Hao
2. Martin A. Green
3. David B. Mitzi
4. Fang-yang Liu
5. H. Cui
6. Yu Feng
7. G. Conibeer
8. Xiaolei Liu

In Materials Chemistry

1. Martin A. Green
2. David B. Mitzi
3. X. Hao
4. Fang-yang Liu
5. H. Cui
6. Yu Feng
7. G. Conibeer
8. Xiaolei Liu

Citations in the corpus

• Development of thin‐film Cu(In,Ga)Se2 and CdTe solar cells (2004, background): “Recently, Orgassa et al.(145) fabricated CIGS solar cells with different back-contact materials, emphasizing the role of the back contact as an optical reflector.”
• The current status and future prospects of kesterite solar cells: a brief review (2016, background): “Pt, Ag, Au, Ti and Ni show a significant diffusion into the CIGS absorber [33,37,47,48].”
• Thin‐film solar cells: an overview (2004, background): “84 Several alternative contact materials are also investigated for CIGS devices.(85) The adhesion of Mo films to the substrate and the sheet resistivity is highly dependent on the sputter deposition conditions.”