A note on the measurement of poverty and vulnerability in the South African context
By Mozaffar Qizilbash. 2002
132 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Nutrition and Dietetics, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/350283035128f84699050a1a17528cb1eaac8513
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nutrition and Dietetics
In Safety Research
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- The Capability Approach: Complexity and vagueness in the capability approach: strengths or weaknesses? (2008, unknown): “53 The application of this approach for measuring poverty necessitates a series of assumption: as Qizilbash (2003) points out, “there are certain ‘admissible’ ways of making the predicate ‘poor’ more precise [.”
- Multidimensional Measures of Well-Being: Standard of Living and Quality of Life Across Countries (2007, background): “See Schokkaert and van Ootegem (1990), Brandolini and d’Alessio (1998), Chiappero Martinetti (2000), Lelli (2001), and Qizilbash (2002).”
- Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined (2017, background): “2 See, among others, Klasen 2000; Laderchi, Saith and Stewart 2003; Qizilbash 2002; Reddy, Visaria and Asali 2009; Alkire et al. 2015.”
- Monitoring Inequality among Social Groups: A Methodology Combining Fuzzy Set Theory and Principal Component Analysis1 (2008, unknown): “Similarly, some multidimensional studies in the CA double count attributes and give implicitly more weight to certain dimensions over others (cf. Brandolini and D’Alessio, 1998; Chiappero Martinetti, 2000; Qizilbash, 2002; Kuklys, 2005).”
- Sen's Capability Approach to Welfare Economics (2004, methodology): “Qizilbash [53] used the 1996 South African Census to analyse provincial rankings of financial poverty and human poverty, with the latter being comprised of 6 functionings and their proxies (education, water, refuse removal, cooking facilities, rooms per household and employment).”