Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom

By J. Lipp. 2007

587 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34f4fe76046fdff3f5c2ebd2cb124e48a5739631

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Policymaker's Guide to Feed-in Tariff Policy Design (2010, background): “…to be the first FIT policy: First, it required utilities to buy electricity generated from qualifying RE facilities at pre-established rates (Lipp 2007); it was production-based, awarding per-kWh payments for the all electricity generated from the facility, rather than simply the surplus;…”
Varieties of capitalism and clean energy transitions in the European Union: When renewable energy hits different economic logics (2016, background): “…cross-sectoral coordination, and close but transparent state-industry relations together with target education and research, demonstration and development (RD&D) programmes constitute factors that generate sustainable renewable energy development (Lipp, 2007; Negro, Alkemade, & Hekkert, 2012).”
The Price of Policy Risk - Empirical Insights from Choice Experiments with European Photovoltaic Project Developers (2012, unknown): “A large number of country-level case studies have been carried out across different geographies, renewable energy technologies and policy instruments (Breukers and Wolsink, 2007; Jacobsson and Lauber, 2006; Lipp, 2007; Toke et al., 2008; Wüstenhagen and Bilharz, 2006).”
Sustainability-oriented innovation systems – managing the green transformation (2012, unknown): “Sector analyses indicate that country-specific policy packages were instrumental in the development of these patterns of specialisation: Denmark’s decision to opt out of nuclear energy and subsidise the development of wind energy technologies as an alternative is a case in point (Lipp, 2007).”
REGULATORY DESIGN FOR RES-E SUPPORT MECHANISMS: LEARNING CURVES, MARKET STRUCTURE, AND BURDEN-SHARING (2012, background): “In other cases, such as Germany, the FIT mechanism, besides being enacted in a law, it takes the form of a supply contract that has the System Operator as counter-party (Lipp, 2007).”
Carbon Lock-Out: Advancing Renewable Energy Policy in Europe (2012, background): “Many analysts agree that FIT systems have been on average more effective than quota systems in spurring the deployment of RES-E technologies and driving down their learning curve [5,24–34]).”
Assessing the Strength and Effectiveness of Renewable Electricity Feed-In Tariffs in European Union Countries (2011, methodology): “Relying on case studies (del Río González and Gual 2007, del Río González 2008, Haas et al. 2011, Lesser and Su 2008, Lipp 2007), and other qualitative evaluation techniques, it has been suggested that FIT policies are an important element in explaining the success of RES development in Europe.”
The institutional space of community initiatives for renewable energy: a comparative case study of the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark (2014, methodology): “To supplement this data for Germany, we refer to case studies on wind power and renewable energy policy in Germany [34-40] and documentation on the Energiewende by nongovernmental organization (NGO)'s and researchers [41,42].”
Promoting renewable electricity generation in imperfect markets: Price vs. quantity policies (2008, unknown): “…to be very effective in countries such as Austria, Denmark, Germany and Spain (e.g. Bode and Groscurth, 2006; del Rı́o and Gual, 2007; del Rı́o, 2008; Lipp, 2007; Lesser and Su, 2008; Couture and Gagnon, 2010; Haas et al., 2011), they cause market distortions to increase when electricity…”