Molecular docking using shape descriptors
By Brian K. Shoichet, Irwin D. Kuntz, D. Bodian. 1992
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Ryan G. Coleman
- Brian K. Shoichet
- John J. Irwin
- Teague Sterling
- Michael Carchia
- Shengyou Huang
- Inbal Halperin
- Ruth Nussinov
Citations in the corpus
- Economic-based Distributed Resource Management and Scheduling for Grid Computing (2002, methodology): “The program dock matches spheres (generated by sphgen) with ligand atoms and uses scoring grids (from grid) to evaluate ligand orientations [11].”
- Comparison of Several Molecular Docking Programs: Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening Accuracy (2009, methodology): “The flexible anchor-and-grow algorithm 38,39 available in DOCK 6.1 was used in this study.”
- Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions (2002, background): “136 Combining all patches of the surface of one protein molecule with all patches of a second molecule takes on the order of 10 7 trials.”
- Insights into Protein–Ligand Interactions: Mechanisms, Models, and Methods (2016, methodology): “In these algorithms, possible ligand conformations may be generated on-the-fly in the binding cavity of the protein [166] (e.g., DOCK [156] uses of this approach), or using the fragmentation-based method in which the multiple rigid fragments located in the binding cavity are rotated and linked [167]”
- Similarity-based machine learning methods for predicting drug-target interactions: a brief review (2014, background): “…two serious problems: (1) we need to know the three-dimensional structure of a target to compute the binding of each drug candidate to the target [16–20], but the three-dimensional structures of many targets, especially GPCRs, are still unavailable [21, 22]; and (2) simulation is time-consuming,…”
- Binding Affinity via Docking: Fact and Fiction (2018, methodology): “Indeed, many of the scoring functions use this approach to model dispersion [5,24,29], although GOLD uses softer 8–4 potential while Dock and Glide prefer 12–6 potential [1,3–5,8–10].”
- Geometric Range Searching and Its Relatives (2007, background): “This is one of the most widely studied problems in computational geometry because it arises in so many di erent areas, including pattern recognition [98, 107], data compression [25, 243], information retrieval [124, 249], CAD [213], molecular biology [261], image analysis [186, 188], data mining [12”
- Accelerating Drugs Discovery with Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Early Approach (2018, background): “Docking is very intensive computationally speaking since it is considered a NP-complete problem [46].”
- Flexible ligand docking using conformational ensembles (1998, methodology): “A steric map was calculated with DISTMAP (Shoichet et al., 1992) using limits of 2.”