Thinking with Your Soul: Spiritual Intelligence and Why It Matters
By R. Wolman. 2001
180 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Education, Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34f06ecf8438bcf0e37f87fe22d1b4fc986b816d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
In Education
In Health
Citations in the corpus
- A Review Study on Spiritual Intelligence, Adolescence and Spiritual Intelligence, Factors that May Contribute to Individual Differences in Spiritual Intelligence, and the Related Theories (2010, background): “Psycho-Matrix Spirituality Inventory (PSI) of Wolman (2001) looks like more a scale of spiritual tendency rather than spiritual intelligence even though his book is entitled as Thinking with your soul: Spiritual intelligence and why it matters.”
- The relationship between nurses’ spiritual intelligence and happiness in Iran (2010, background): “Based on different definitions of spiritual intelligence in its the role in solving existential problems, finding a meaning and purpose for our deeds and the phenomena of life have been emphasized (Zohar and Marshal, 2000, Sisk, 2001, Wolman, 2001, Nasel, 2004, King, 2007). figure1.”
- A Viable Model and Self-Report Measure of Spiritual Intelligence (2009, background): “The recent influx of publications on spiritual intelligence (e.g., Amram, 2007; Emmons, 2000a; Nasel, 2004; Noble, 2000; Vaughan, 2002; Wolman, 2001; Zohar & Marshall, 2000) has further emphasized the need for the construct’s accurate identification.”
- The contribution of emotional and spiritual intelligences to effective business leadership (2009, methodology): “Furthermore, over the past 9 years there has been an emerging interest in integrating the constructs of spirituality and intelligence into a single construct called spiritual intelligence (Amram, 2007; Amram & Dryer, 2008; Emmons, 1999, 2000a, 2000b; Halama & Strizenec, 2004; Levin, 2000; Nasel, 200”