GREATER SAGE-GROUSE NESTING HABITAT SELECTION AND SUCCESS IN WYOMING

By M. Holloran, B. Heath, A. G. Lyon, Steven J. Slater, Jarren L. Kuipers, S. Anderson. 2005

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Characteristics and Dynamics of Greater Sage-Grouse Populations (2011, background): “…50 (54) Lyon and Anderson (2003) 78 (111) 14 (73) 25 (97) Slater (2003) 60 (82) Holloran (1999) 7 (66) Holloran (2005) 81 (597) 9 (597) 49 (597) Holloran et al. (2005) 82 (73) 57 (14) 64 (42) Kaiser (2006) 67 (52) 66 (52) Jensen (2006) Range 7–8 67–100 9–38 25–70 47–70 Average (SD) 7.5 (0.5)…”
Nest Predation of Greater Sage-Grouse in Relation to Microhabitat Factors and Predators (2010, background): “…features identified as important to sage-grouse include presence of sagebrush (Artemisia spp.; Connelly et al. 1991), canopy cover (Wallestad and Pyrah 1974, Gregg et al. 1994), grass height (Gregg et al. 1994, Holloran et al. 2005), and understory cover (Gregg et al. 1994, DeLong et al. 1995).”
Managing Multiple Vital Rates To Maximize Greater Sage Grouse Population Growth (2012, background): “The concept that productivity regulates population growth is widely cited in studies of sage-grouse reproductive biology (e.g., Drut et al. 1994, Holloran et al. 2005, Huwer et al. 2008); however, sage-grouse have larger body size, smaller clutch sizes, lower renesting rates, higher annual…”
Range‐wide patterns of greater sage‐grouse persistence (2008, background): “Drought conditions result in decreased nest success (Holloran et al., 2005) and/or reduced chick survival (Aldridge, 2005).”