Autonomy and Consent

By T. Beauchamp. 2009

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34d290bb48df5b352152d9a3a7e3467d8ccb6a22

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Ronald E. Purser
2. J. Sim
3. J. Waterfield

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Ronald E. Purser
2. J. Sim
3. J. Waterfield

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Ronald E. Purser
2. J. Sim
3. J. Waterfield

Citations in the corpus

• Clearing the Muddled Path of Traditional and Contemporary Mindfulness: a Response to Monteiro, Musten, and Compson (2015, methodology): “Drawing from the work of ethicist Beauchamp (2010), Brown (2013, p. 201) reiterated his main premise that “patients cannot intentionally participate in CAM without understanding the consequences of their actions for both health and religion.””
• Focus group methodology: some ethical challenges (2019, background): “The underlying moral ground of consent is centred primarily in the notion of autonomy, on the basis that the consent process can be seen as a means of protecting and supporting autonomous decision making on the part of the research participant (Faden and Beauchamp 1986; Beauchamp 2009).”