Assessment of Complications After Pancreatic Surgery: A Novel Grading System Applied to 633 Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy

By M. DeOliveira, J. Winter, M. Schafer, S. Cunningham, John L. Cameron, C. Yeo, P. Clavien. Annals of Surgery, 2006

849 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34cba6f77999a077a7712ac3608d96774fa8686a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Oncology

1. W. Hawkins
2. Charles M. Perou
3. S. Strasberg
4. D. Linehan
5. C. Der

In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

1. C. Der

Citations in the corpus

• A Six-Gene Signature Predicts Survival of Patients with Localized Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (2010, background): “Yet with a median survival only of less than 2 y after surgery, the attendant postoperative mortality rate of 2%–6% [40,41], and postoperative complication and hospital readmission rates of 59% [41,42], the decision for surgery should be made cautiously.”
• The Accordion Severity Grading System of Surgical Complications (2009, background): “7%) even in those describing complex procedures with large numbers of complications.(85,95,99) In comparison grade 3a, 3b, 4a, and 5 complications made up a much larger percent of complications— 14.”