Shared producer and consumer responsibility — Theory and practice

By Manfred Lenzen, Joy Murray, Fabian Sack, T. Wiedmann. 2007

675 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34c9ed8a9b0f5f2942d027181c95f9848673d472

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. T. Wiedmann
2. G. P. Peters
3. Manfred Lenzen
4. D. Guan
5. Robbie M. Andrew
6. Richard Wood
7. Edgar G. Hertwich
8. Klaus Hubacek

In Environmental Engineering

1. T. Wiedmann
2. G. P. Peters
3. Manfred Lenzen
4. D. Guan
5. S. Giljum
6. Robbie M. Andrew
7. Richard Wood
8. Edgar G. Hertwich

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. T. Wiedmann
2. G. P. Peters
3. Manfred Lenzen
4. Edgar G. Hertwich
5. D. Guan
6. Klaus Hubacek
7. Richard Wood
8. J. Minx

Citations in the corpus

• Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions (2010, background): “Because economic welfare in a region benefits from the production of goods within its territory, there are quantitative approaches aimed at sharing responsibility for emissions among producers and consumers (14, 17, 18).”
• China’s provincial CO2 emissions embodied in international and interprovincial trade (2012, neutral): “We suggest that China should adopt the ‘‘shared principle’’ (Lenzen et al., 2007).”
• Consumer and producer environmental responsibility: Comparing two approaches (2008, methodology): “Lenzen et al. (2007) support partial transfer of indirect effects in order to be able to assign responsibility to purely intermediate agents, which in turn leads to decreasing responsibility with increasing distance along the supply chain.”
• The Global Dimension of Water Governance: Why the River Basin Approach Is No Longer Sufficient and Why Cooperative Action at Global Level Is Needed (2010, background): “responsibility over consumers and producers is an issue of ongoing debate [104,105].”
• Consumption‐based carbon accounting: does it have a future? (2017, background): “While Lenzen et al.(65) and Andrew and Forgie(44) have offered some examples of shared-responsibility schemes, more work is required to examine the potential implications of moving toward a middle-ground, especially from a global perspective.”
• Carbon and Materials Embodied in the International Trade of Emerging Economies (2012, background): “Suggestions include an equal splitting of shares between consumers and producers (Rodrigues and Domingos 2008; Rodrigues et al. 2006), or a calculation of shares based on the distribution of added value across countries and sectors (Andrew and Forgie 2008; Lenzen et al. 2007).”