Calculated Sputtering, Reflection and Range Values
By W. Eckstein. 2002
150 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34b0ee58b4730a26042d316e1ca618d98efc6e31
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- T. J. Petty
- R. Doerner
- M. Baldwin
- M. Hasan
- James Bradley
- Karl D. Hammond
- O. El-Atwani
- G. Wright
Citations in the corpus
- Basic physical processes and reduced models for plasma detachment (2018, unknown): “Since the self-sputtering yield for W exceeds unity for impact energy 1 keV [25], in principle a self-sputtering cascade can occur; however, Chankin [28] has shown that this is very unlikely to occur for expected divertor conditions in ITER.”
- Observations of suppressed retention and blistering for tungsten exposed to deuterium–helium mixture plasmas (2009, unknown): “Ion ranges of D and He in W as a function of ion energy [18].”
- Fuel retention studies with the ITER-Like Wall in JET (2013, unknown): “laboratory studies [27], comparable erosion yields providing”
- Tungsten ‘fuzz’ growth re-examined: the dependence on ion fluence in non-erosive and erosive helium plasma (2015, background): “Accordingly, if the yield is taken from measurements or predictions [24] of the sputter yield made for bulk tungsten (Ybulk), the porosity term cancels and fuzz = bulk, as was demonstrated recently in [7].”