Can Luck Egalitarianism Justify the Fact that Some are Worse Off than Others

By R. Huseby. 2016

9 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Reuben Binns
2. Emilio Ferrara

In Philosophy

1. Reuben Binns

Citations in the corpus

• Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy (2017, background): “A second major strand of debate in egalitarian thinking considers the role of notions like choice Huseby (2016) and desert Temkin (1986) in determining which inequalities are acceptable?”
• On the apparent conflict between individual and group fairness (2019, background): “A prominent approach, known as luck egalitarianism, holds that inequalities be-tween people are only just provided they are not the result of brute luck [4, 29, 46].”