Resource-driven terrestrial interaction webs

By P. Price. Ecological research, 2002

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/348ce39ac70407da5c8653cc6332b24da7bc41af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. R. Dennis
2. R. Cocroft
3. T. Shreeve
4. R. L. Rodríguez
5. R. Hunt
6. T. Hefin Jones
7. Ferenc Jord
8. J. Perner

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. R. Dennis
2. T. Shreeve
3. Ferenc Jord
4. J. Perner
5. R. Grenyer
6. David Roy
7. Winfried Voigt
8. J. Hodgson

In Plant Science

1. R. L. Rodríguez
2. T. Shreeve
3. R. Hunt
4. Ferenc Jord
5. J. Perner
6. David Roy
7. R. Cocroft
8. T. Ohgushi

Citations in the corpus

• Host shifts and signal divergence: mating signals covary with host use in a complex of specialized plant‐feeding insects (2009, background): “…insects constitute a large fraction of terrestrial diversity, and provide many likely examples of ecological speciation (Tauber © 2010 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2010, 99, 60–72 & Tauber, 1989; Mallet, 2001; Price, 2002; Bush & Butlin, 2004).”
• Network ecology: topological constraints on ecosystem dynamics (2004, background): “, see (139)) but if real data will be analyzed, we will be constrained to talk mostly about food webs representing only predation (who eats whom), since data bases mostly describe only these, probably the most important interspecific relationships.”
• Using functional groups to investigate community response to environmental changes: two grassland case studies (2007, background): “Interactions between different trophic levels may also include nonconsumption and noncompetitive relationships (Ohgushi, 1997; Price, 2002).”
• Host plants and butterfly biology. Do host‐plant strategies drive butterfly status? (2004, background): “As butterflies are phytophagous, there is an expectation that contrasting host-plant attributes hold the key to changes in butterfly status because insect life-history traits link to characteristics of their host plants (e.g. Price, 2002; Hunter, 2003).”
• Bottom-up trophic cascades and material transfer in terrestrial food webs (2005, background): “While such a top-down concept in which a higher trophic level dominates populations and/or communities of lower trophic levels has been widely accepted, lower trophic levels can also propagate upward to nonadjacent higher trophic levels (Hunter and Price 1992; Price 2002); this is called ‘‘bottom-up”