Exploiting the errors: A simple approach for improved volatility forecasting
By Tim Bollerslev, Andrew J. Patton, R. Quaedvlieg. 2016
407 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/348420be931aa69493f2164a54363dce0aa2ebec
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Finance
Citations in the corpus
- Forecasting realized volatility of agricultural commodity futures with infinite Hidden Markov HAR models (2019, positive): “Based on Fleming & Hern´andez-Hern´andez (2003), Bollerslev et al. (2016), and Callot et al. (2017), we use the quadratic utility with risk aversion to determine the economic values of various forecast models: In this paper, we consider two levels of risk aversion rates for the investor, the mild…”
- Forecasting the realized range-based volatility using dynamic model averaging approach (2017, methodology): “This model is popularly employed in forecasting volatility and shows its outstanding performance in capturing "stylized facts" in financial market, such as long memory and multi-scale behavior of volatility (Andersen et al., 2007; Corsi et al., 2010; Bekaert and Hoerova, 2014; Duong and Swanson, 201”
- Forecasting the volatility of Bitcoin: The importance of jumps and structural breaks (2020, positive): “Bollerslev et al. (2016) also observe that there exists substantial estimation bias in daily , while the attenuation bias is much less severe in the weekly and monthly ones.”