Early Prediction of Sepsis From Clinical Data: The PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019

By PhD Matthew A. Reyna, MD Christopher S. Josef, PhD Russell Jeter, Supreeth Prajwal Shashikumar, M. P. M. Brandon Westover, PhD Shamim Nemati, G. D. C. DPhil, PhD Ashish Sharma, San Diego. 2019 Computing in Cardiology (CinC), 2019

517 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge focused on the early detection of sepsis from clinical data. A total of 40,336 patient records from two distinct hospital systems were shared with participants while 22,761 patient records from three distinct hospital systems were sequestered as hidden test sets. Each patient record contained up to 40 measurements of vital sign, laboratory, and demographics data for over 2.5 million hourly time windows and over 15 million data points. We used the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria to define the onset time of sepsis.We challenged participants to design automated, open-source algorithms for predicting sepsis 6 hours before clinical recognition of sepsis. We developed a novel, clinical utility-based evaluation metric to assess each algorithm that rewards early sepsis predictions and penalizes late or missed predictions and false alarms.A total of 104 teams from academia and industry submitted a total of 853 entries during the official phase of the Challenge. We accepted 90 abstracts based on Challenge entries for presentations at Computing in Cardiology. We also compared entries to ensure that approaches from different teams remained independent. This article presents our analysis and discusses the implications of the Challenge for early sepsis predictions and related sequential prediction tasks.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Epidemiology, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/347e5ae3338217f465e6df8b3b02193b59d2425d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Patrick Kidger
  2. Terry Lyons
  3. G. Clifford
  4. James Foster
  5. James Morrill

In Epidemiology

  1. G. Clifford

In Signal Processing

  1. G. Clifford

Citations in the corpus