Measurement Theory, Psychology and the Revolution That Cannot Happen

By G. Trendler. 2009

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/347d2f8445859dfed03fb7f3df33fe64b5bdab16

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Psychology

1. Roziah Mohd Janor
2. Rohana Yusoff
3. J. McGrane

In History and Philosophy of Science

1. Roziah Mohd Janor
2. Rohana Yusoff
3. J. McGrane

Citations in the corpus

• Stevens’ forgotten crossroads: the divergent measurement traditions in the physical and psychological sciences from the mid-twentieth century (2015, background): “Moreover, there has been very little mainstream academic dialog and debate about this absence, although a groundswell has been building the past two decades (for examples see Michell, 1999; Trendler, 2009; Humphry, 2011; Sherry, 2011; Kyngdon, 2013).”
• Generation of an Interval Metric Scale to Measure Attitude (2014, background): “The fuel is none other than one party is adamantly insisting that whatever variable is represented numerically on a rating scale should have relationships between its values isomorphic to the relationships between the numbers (Albaum, 1997; Harwell & Gatti, 2001; Knapp, 1990; Michell, 1997; Trendler”