Physical Literacy From Philosophy to Practice

By N. Pot, M. Whitehead, E. Durden-Myers. Journal of teaching in physical education, 2018

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This article aims to give an overview of the philosophical foundations of physical literacy (monism, existentialism, and phenomenology) and to discuss how philosophy can be operationalized in physical education practice. When translated into physical education practice, the physical literacy philosophies give credence to the view that, in schools, physical education should not be considered as a subsidiary subject that is needed merely to refresh the mind for the cognitive subjects. The authors also highlight that the context in which activities take place should be challenging, realistic, and adaptable to the individual preferences and levels of attainment of the different learners. Often, these contexts go beyond the traditional competitive sports context. Drawing on these philosophies, physical education must be learner centered and provide situations in which learners can discover and develop their individual potential to stay motivated, confident, and competent for engagement in physical activities for life.

Subfields: Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/347a08f0d10e8584d4bdeb3161bb3b2a8344f873

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

  1. E. Durden-Myers
  2. N. Pot
  3. N. Green
  4. M. Whitehead

In Social Psychology

  1. E. Durden-Myers
  2. M. Whitehead
  3. N. Pot

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. E. Durden-Myers
  2. N. Pot
  3. N. Green
  4. M. Whitehead

Citations in the corpus