The replacement series

By P. Jolliffe. 2000

313 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3477fc3e243685dff5df7560cf5c7f348d07ace7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Experiment designs to evaluate inter- and intra-specific interactions in mixed plantings of forest trees (2006, background): “2006), whilst maintaining a constant overall stand density (de Wit 1960; Jolliffe 2000).”
Functional diversity predicts overyielding effect of species combination on primary productivity (2009, background): “The alternative designs provide complementary information on species interactions � the additive tests the effect of interspecific interactions, whereas the substitutive examines the balance between intra- and interspecific interactions ( Jolliffe 2000, Griffen 2006).”
The Influence of Intraguild Predation on the Suppression of a Shared Prey Population: An Empirical Reassessment (2006, background): “The relative merits of these two designs have been extensively discussed in the literature (Connolly 1988, Jolliffe 2000, see Straub and Snyder this volume); whereas the replacement series design may be particularly appropriate for some aspects of the study of how predator diversity per se influen”
Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades (2004, methodology): “We manipulated predator diversity by using an additive treatment design to hold intraspecific interactions among Tytthus constant across levels of diversit”
Growth and Species Interactions of Eucalyptus pellita in a Mixed and Monoculture Plantation in the H (2006, methodology): “The traditional analysis of replacement series experiments is further compromised where the design is altered prior to canopy closure and the onset of between-tree competition ( Jolliffe 2000 ), as with this trial, creating different growth environments than intended.”
Mixed-species plantations of Eucalyptus with nitrogen-fixing trees: A review (2006, methodology): “There are several designs used for mixed-species experiments (Harper, 1977; Jolliffe, 2000; Freckleton and Watkinson, 2000; Vanclay, 2006), but the two most common types are the replacement series and additive series designs.”
Overyielding among plant functional groups in a long‐term experiment (2003, background): “Similarly, SE and the original definition of the sampling effect do not correspond precisely, as pointed out by Loreau & Hector (2001) (see also Loreau 2000).”
Biodiversity and biocontrol: emergent impacts of a multi-enemy assemblage on pest suppression and crop yield in an agroecosystem (2003, background): “A further benefit of the additive series design is that intra- and interspecific interactions are less likely to be confounded across levels of diversity ‐ a problem that can hinder interpretation of treatment effects in the more widely used replacement-series design where the density of each specie”
Competition Experiments on Alien Weeds with Crops: Lessons for Measuring Plant Invasion Impact? (2004, background): “Neither do they allow the separation of intraspecific from interspecific competition nor do they disentangle the contribution to interference from each of the constituents of the mixture (Jolliffe 2000).”
Presence and identity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence competitive interactions between plant species (2007, background): “The results obtained from replacement experiments can be influenced by factors such as density, size differences and time of harvest (Connolly 1986; Snaydon 1991; Gibson et al. 1999; Jolliffe 2000).”
Reciprocal effects of host plant and natural enemy diversity on herbivore suppression: an empirical study of a model tritrophic system (2005, background): “The relative merits of the replacement and additive series designs have been discussed at length (Connolly 1988, Jolliffe 2000), and each has strengths and limitations.”