Which policy instruments to induce clean innovating

By Reinhilde Veugelers. 2012

418 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3472f70f1196d104edb280cfc060bbc38a872a82

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Beyond market failures: the market creating and shaping roles of state investment banks (2016, neutral): “…featured studies that looked at a limited number of financial (supply-side) tools, namely non-reimbursable public finance for basic research and innovation, such as grants (Sampat 2012; Wright 2012), subsidies (including tax credits; see Veugelers 2012) and innovation prizes (Murray et al. 2012).”
What are the determinants of investment in environmental R&D? (2017, neutral): “…between environmental innovation investment and different policy instruments governing environmental innovation, that is, environmental regulations and a set of policy measures that include R &D subsidies and environmental taxes (Del Río, 2009; Horbach et al., 2012; Veugelers, 2012; Marin, 2014).”
Mobilizing private finance for low-carbon innovation – A systematic review of barriers and solutions (2017, positive): “Effective measures include public-private RD&D partnerships [10], advocacy coalitions with financiers [22], mission-driven public investments [144,167], demand stimulus [120] and a (RD&D) tax-system reform [17,57,137].”
Green growth versus economic growth: Do sustainable technology transfer and innovations lead to an imperfect choice? (2021, background): “Veugelers (2012) investigated the reasons for introducing environmental innovations in different sectors.”
Lock-in and path dependence: an evolutionary approach to eco-innovations (2014, background): “If such a success depends on firms’ anticipatory capacity, policy makers should also reduce uncertainty in the development of new regulations, since, according to Veugelers (2012), more than present ones, it is future regulations that have an impact on current eco-innovations.”
Environmental Policy and Innovation: A Decade of Research (2019, methodology): “Several studies use survey data to attain information on the types of policies faced (e.g. Hornbach et al. 2012, Veugelers 2012), policy relevance (Stucki et al., 2018), or policy consistency (Rogge and Schleich 2018).”
How China's current carbon trading policy affects carbon price? An investigation of the Shanghai Emission Trading Scheme pilot (2018, background): “However, the published policy always brings a swing of stakeholders' sentiment, thereby causing some market risks (Veugelers, 2012).”
Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: The case of the biofuels sector (2015, background): “Different studies have highlighted the difficulties in ranking price-based and quantity-based instruments with regard to their effectiveness in spurring eco-innovation (Fischer et al., 2003; Kemp and Pontoglio, 2011; Requate, 2005; Veugelers, 2012).”
A TAXONOMY OF GREEN INNOVATORS:EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SOUTH KOREA (2017, methodology): “5 Veuglers (2012) also finds supporting evidence that the combination of both environmental- and R&D- and innovation policy are more influential than any single one in isolation.”
Public financing of innovation: new questions (2017, background): “Hence, the main conclusion that a market failure perspective can draw is that existing policies—besides R&D support—are inefficient, and should instead focus on a carbon tax and small interventions to start the ‘private innovation machine’ (Veugelers, 2012).”