Limited attention: the constraint underlying search image
218 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Sensory Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3452e5bf5d583ea8e2e72f820190d573e32ca31b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- E. Fernández‐Juricic
- Daniel T. Blumstein
- A. Bond
- Masakazu Shimada
- K. Hughes
- F. Rodd
- D. Punzalan
- Y. Ishii
In Sensory Systems
Citations in the corpus
- Perceptual Processes and the Maintenance of Polymorphism Through Frequency-dependent Predation (2005, background): “Moment, 1962; Clarke, 1962a; Bond, 1983; Lawrence, 1985; Gendron, 1986; Allen, 1988a, b; Endler, 1988; Gillespie and Tabashnik, 1990; Dukas and Ellner, 1993; Dukas and Kamil, 2001 ).”
- Diet specialisation and foraging efficiency under fluctuating vole abundance: a comparison between generalist and specialist avian predators (2011, background): “This phenomenon of limited attention helps to understand why specialists tend to forage more efficiently than generalists, through a search image formation on a given food type (Dukas and Kamil 2001).”
- The effect of learning and search images on predator–prey interactions (2009, background): “Therefore, predators can forage with greater efficiency when they temporarily specialize on a single cryptic prey and ignore alternatives (Dukas and Kamil 2001).”
- The Evolution of Color Polymorphism: Crypticity, Searching Images, and Apostatic Selection (2007, background): “It has, however, recently been clearly demonstrated by Dukas & Kamil (2000, 2001) with blue jays in an operant apparatus, using a design that compelled the birds to divide their attention either between spatial locations or between stimulus types.”
- Sensitivity of wildlife to spatial patterns of recreationist behavior: A critical assessment of minimum approaching distances and buffer areas for grassland birds (2005, background): “A bird may need more time detecting a threat that is moving at a slower rate than one that is moving at a higher rate of approach, particularly if the bird s attention is not towards the threat while it approaches (Dukas and Kamil, 2000, 2001).”