Brief Communications: Gender Differences in Gambling Progression

By H. Tavares, M. Zilberman, F. Beites, V. Gentil. Journal of Gambling Studies, 2004

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/344396d4f7932c3e8d6d3405477aae71bb80b4e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. H. Lesieur
2. B. Gambino

In Pharmacology

1. H. Lesieur
2. B. Gambino

In Plant Science

1. H. Lesieur
2. B. Gambino

Citations in the corpus

• The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A rebuttal to critics (2006, methodology): “Other investigators have employed statistical modeling techniques for the purpose of validation, including factor analysis (e.g., Winters, Stinchfield, & Fulkerson, 1993), logistic regression (e.g., Poulin, 2002; Welte, Barnes, Wieczorek, Tidwell, & Parker, 2001), Rasch analysis (Strong, Lesieur, Br”