Comparability of cause of death between ICD-9 and ICD-10: preliminary estimates.

By R. N. Anderson, A. Miniño, D. Hoyert, H. Rosenberg. National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System, 2001

670 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34423c916c37ce10110debfb879bb42c32ee4f65

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A. Jemal
R. Siegel
Elizabeth E. Ward
Ali H. Mokdad
E. Ford
J. Boyle
M. Engelgau
L. Geiss

Citations in the corpus

Factors Influencing the Decline in Stroke Mortality (2013, methodology): “The comparability ratio from ICD-8 to ICD-9 was 1.004930 for cerebrovascular disease (ICD-8 and ICD-9 codes 430–438); the ratio from ICD-9 to ICD-10 was 1.0588 (ICD-9 codes 430–438 and ICD-10 codes I60–I69).31 According to the National Center for Health Statistics, this nearly 6% increase for cerebr”
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Surveillance—United States, 1971–2000 (2002, unknown): “05 for all chronic lower respiratory diseases, which includes asthma (26).”
Cause-specific excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. (2007, methodology): “We used underlying cause-of-death information that had been recoded using a standard list of 113 causes of death; details of the corresponding International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes are shown elsewhere.(4) We grouped deaths into 3 major categories: cardiova”
Trends in the leading causes of death in the United States, 1970-2002. (2005, background): “06.(12,13) Several important insights are suggested by these temporal trends in the deathratesandnumberofdeathsatvarious ages.”
The Evolving Diabetes Burden in the United States (2004, background): “In 2000, under the new 10th version of the International Classification of Diseases, diabetes was the sixth leading cause of death in the United States (35).”
Deaths: final data for 1999. (2001, methodology): “standard errors associated with comparability ratios are based on sampling and stochastic (random) variation (9).”
Deaths: final data for 2006. (2009, unknown): “22 1999 is also complicated by a comparability ratio that may be understated (22-24).”
Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1999, featuring implications of age and aging on U.S. cancer burden (2002, background): “The nature and extent of these discontinuities are described in a recent report.(18) The extent of these discontinuities is measured by comparability studies in which death records are double coded by the two revisions and results compared.”
Statistical demography and forecasting (2005, background): “Smith, Rice, and Carr-Hill (2001) describe the use of formulas to allocate large amounts of funds in the United Kingdom.”
Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2001, with a special feature regarding survival (2004, background): “the underlying cause of death than under previous ICD rules.(17) Sites were grouped by SEER to allow for”