THE CRIMINOGENIC EFFECTS OF IMPRISONMENT: EVIDENCE FROM STATE PANEL DATA, 1974–2002

By Lynne M. Vieraitis, T. Kovandzic, Thomas B. Marvell. 2007

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Graham C. Ousey
2. P. Wilcox
3. Sara Brummel
4. Lance Hannon
5. R. Defina
6. Lily Hu
7. Margit Averdijk
8. Ben Green

Citations in the corpus

• For incapacitation, there is no time like the present: The lagged effects of prisoner reentry on property and violent crime rates (2010, background): “Ultimately, Vieraitis et al.’s (2007) results provide little support for either a general or”
• Déjà vu All Over Again: Investigating Temporal Continuity of Adolescent Victimization (2008, background): “Although we are not aware of its application in the victimization literature, it increasingly has appeared in a variety of other criminological studies (Bushway et al. 1999; Ousey and Lee 2004, 2007; Vieraitis et al. 2007 ).”
• The Myth in the Methodology: Towards a Recontextualization of Fairness in Machine Learning (2018, background): “Moreover, because of the criminogenic effects of incarceration (Cullen et al., 2011; Vieraitis et al., 2007), such predictions could in fact impede efforts to reduce recidivism—thus perpetuating the cycle of recidivism and incarceration that is rooted in racial injustice.”