Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: Moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas

By Katherine V. Kortenkamp, C. Moore. 2001

369 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3421e1ca42c8c856d95d823c5936d5cc4902b2c5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. T. Milfont
2. J. Berenguer
3. J. Duckitt
4. C. Moore
5. Katherine V. Kortenkamp
6. M. Bonnes
7. Marino Bonaiuto
8. G. Carrus

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Berenguer
2. T. Milfont
3. J. Duckitt
4. C. Moore
5. Katherine V. Kortenkamp

In Sociology and Political Science

1. T. Milfont
2. J. Berenguer
3. J. Duckitt
4. C. Moore
5. Katherine V. Kortenkamp
6. Marino Bonaiuto
7. M. Bonnes
8. G. Carrus

Citations in the corpus

• Time, Uncertainty, and Individual Differences in Decisions to Cooperate in Resource Dilemmas (2006, methodology): “Two were environmental attitude measures: the New Environmental Paradigm (NEP) (Dunlap et al., 2000; Dunlap & Van Liere, 1978) and the Environmental Attitudes Scale (EAS) (Ebenbach, 1999; Kortenkamp & Moore, 2001).”
• The Effect of Empathy in Environmental Moral Reasoning (2010, methodology): “We indeed considered the possibility of working with dilemmas created by the participants themselves, although this methodology leads to considerable variation in the type and number of dilemmas produced (Kortenkamp & Moore, 2001) and makes it enormously difficult to control intervening variables.”
• Environmental Concern, Regional Identity, and Support for Protected Areas in Italy (2005, background): “…conceived as a type of commons dilemma, particularly for those local stakeholders who derive their daily sustenance from the exploitation of natural resources within the protected area, resources such as fresh water, land, forests, wild animals, and agricultural products (Kortenkamp & Moore, 2001).”
• The structure of environmental attitudes: A first- and second-order confirmatory factor analysis (2004, background): “…consistent with several previous investigators who, using different approaches and item sets, have reported findings suggesting a broad higher-order bidimensionality of EA (Stern & Dietz, 1994; Thompson & Barton, 1994; Kortenkamp & Moore, 2001; Kaiser & Scheuthle, 2003; Wiseman & Bogner, 2003).”