Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: in-plane cyclic loading

458 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In-plane behaviour of tuff masonry strengthened with inorganic matrix–grid composites (2013, background): “Past experimental programs [12–14] have assessed innovative strengthening systems based on cementitious mortar matrices, highlighting a significant improvement in both in-plane and outof-plane lateral strengths of masonry walls.”
Round Robin Test for composite-to-brick shear bond characterization (2012, background): “…the possibility of folding the strips, as well as application with inorganic materials such as matrix (e.g., mortars based on hydraulic binders), to improve compatibility and removability (Borri et al. 2007; Cancelli et al. 2007; Papanicolaou et al. 2007, 2008 and 2011; Garmendia et al. 2011).”
Mortar-based systems for externally bonded strengthening of masonry (2014, background): “…they are advantageous in terms of overlay-tosubstrate compatibility, transpirability, reversibility, fire resistance, cost, and applicability (Papanicolaou et al., 2007; 2008; Cancelli et al., 2007; Carbone and de Felice 2008; Borri et al., 2011; Garmendia et al., 2011; Malena and de Felice,…”