Kissing numbers, sphere packings, and some unexpected proofs
By Florian Pfender, Günter M. Ziegler. 2004
103 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/341c9d9f6315049a70601e8f1f6c23b95eebd2e7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Henry Cohn
- Maryna S. Viazovska
- Danylo V. Radchenko
- Abhinav Kumar
- Stephen D. Miller
- J. Dattorro
- Salvatore Torquato
- Marco Cuturi
Citations in the corpus
- Convex Optimization & Euclidean Distance Geometry (2004, methodology): “316-322] [41] [58] [88] [89] [187] [202] [207] [248] [249] [273] [276] Course enrollment for Spring quarter 2005 at Stanford was 170 students.”
- The sphere packing problem in dimension 24 (2016, methodology): “nique was successfully applied to obtain upper bounds in a wide range of discrete optimization problems such as error-correcting codes [7], equal weight quadrature formulas [8], spherical codes [13], [16]. In exceptional cases linear programming bounds are optimal [5]. However, in general situation ”
- The sphere packing problem in dimension 8The sphere packing problem in dimension 8 (2016, methodology): “This technique was successfully applied to obtain upper bounds in a wide range of discrete optimization problems such as error-correcting codes [7], equal weight quadrature formulas [8], and spherical codes [13], [16].”