First I "like" it, then I hide it: Folk Theories of Social Feeds
By Motahhare Eslami, K. G. Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, Kristen Vaccaro, Aimee Rickman, Kevin Hamilton, A. Kirlik. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2016
400 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3411f97b3ed4761f3d20fffaa0cbcdd62e76e650
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Science Applications
- Reuben Binns
- K. G. Karahalios
- Christian Sandvig
- Kevin Hamilton
- Motahhare Eslami
- Darren Gergle
- Sneha R. Krishna Kumaran
- Michael Ann DeVito
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
In Human-Computer Interaction
- Dan Delmonaco
- Nadia Karizat
- Anne Marie Piper
- Motahhare Eslami
- Nazanin Andalibi
- Darren Gergle
- Michael Ann DeVito
- Jonas Oppenlaender
Citations in the corpus
- The Illusion of Control: Placebo Effects of Control Settings (2018, background): “This work (along with others that do not directly test non-functional operations) has shown that users are so likely to trust an algorithmic system that when making sense of the system, they will disregard evidence of failures by taking personal responsibility for them, or assuming an algorithmic om”
- Addressing Age-Related Bias in Sentiment Analysis (2018, background): “Researchers have examined how people may attempt to reverse engineer systems based on their understanding of algorithms [5], how altering the design of system features affects an individual’s understanding of algorithms [21,24], and how understanding algorithms affects user behavior [25].”
- 'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage': Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions (2018, background): “But in the absence of transparency from platform providers, end-users may develop folk theories of algorithms, leading to a diverse range of strategies and countermeasures with varying degrees of effectiveness [22, 14].”
- Prompt Engineering for Text-Based Generative Art (2022, background): “Some of these choices may fall into the realm of folk theories [13, 17] – that is, causal attributions that may or may not be true –, while other choices may be based on the practitioner’s experimentation and experience with prompt engineering.”
- "Algorithms ruin everything": #RIPTwitter, Folk Theories, and Resistance to Algorithmic Change in Social Media (2017, background): “[10] as well as in prior folk theory work (e.”
- Algorithmic Folk Theories and Identity: How TikTok Users Co-Produce Knowledge of Identity and Engage in Algorithmic Resistance (2021, background): “They held Eslami et al.’s Personal Engagement Theory of Social Feeds [30] observed in the Facebook context, believing actions such as liking or commenting on a video informed the algorithm and in � uenced what they saw on their FYP.”
- Communicating Algorithmic Process in Online Behavioral Advertising (2018, background): “This perception corresponds with the “eye of providence” folk theory from previous research wherein users perceived algorithmic systems to be all-powerful and all-knowing [13, 49].”