The unreasonable effectiveness of deep learning in artificial intelligence

By Terrence J. Sejnowski. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020

331 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Deep learning networks have been trained to recognize speech, caption photographs, and translate text between languages at high levels of performance. Although applications of deep learning networks to real-world problems have become ubiquitous, our understanding of why they are so effective is lacking. These empirical results should not be possible according to sample complexity in statistics and nonconvex optimization theory. However, paradoxes in the training and effectiveness of deep learning networks are being investigated and insights are being found in the geometry of high-dimensional spaces. A mathematical theory of deep learning would illuminate how they function, allow us to assess the strengths and weaknesses of different network architectures, and lead to major improvements. Deep learning has provided natural ways for humans to communicate with digital devices and is foundational for building artificial general intelligence. Deep learning was inspired by the architecture of the cerebral cortex and insights into autonomy and general intelligence may be found in other brain regions that are essential for planning and survival, but major breakthroughs will be needed to achieve these goals.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computational Theory and Mathematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/340712391e245e245a76cd74523c1d6443035b62

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Xuhui Meng
  2. G. Em Karniadakis
  3. Lu Lu
  4. Zhiping Mao
  5. Shengze Cai
  6. Zhongqiang Zhang
  7. Somdatta Goswami
  8. Stephane T Aroca-Ouellette

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. G. Em Karniadakis
  2. Lu Lu
  3. Stephane T Aroca-Ouellette
  4. Andreas Lanitis
  5. Frank Rudzicz
  6. Eleni Dimitriadou
  7. Demetres Kostas

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Xuhui Meng
  2. Lu Lu
  3. Somdatta Goswami
  4. Zhiping Mao
  5. G. Em Karniadakis
  6. Andreas Lanitis
  7. Eleni Dimitriadou
  8. Paris Perdikaris

Citations in the corpus