Design-oriented stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete

1,570 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

FRP-confined Concrete Cylinders: Axial Compression Experiments and Strength Model (2010, background): “This reduction in the strain of the FRP composites can be attributed to several causes as reported in related literature [25,32,38]:”
Behavior and Modeling of Concrete Confined with FRP Composites of Large Deformability (2011, background): “Lam and Teng (2004) attributed this difference to factors such as the deformation nonuniformity of cracked concrete.”
Design-Oriented Stress-Strain Model for FRP-Confined Concrete in Rectangular Columns (2003, methodology): “Lam and Teng [9] recently proposed a design-oriented stress–strain model for concrete uniformly confined with FRP based on a careful interpretation of key test observations and a large amount of test data.”
Experimental testing and analytical modeling of CFRP-confined large circular RC columns subjected to cyclic axial compression (2012, methodology): “In other studies, Lam and Teng [28] recommended a value of 0.”
Refinement of a Design-Oriented Stress–Strain Model for FRP-Confined Concrete (2009, methodology): “3 Lam and Teng’s stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete Lam and Teng’s (2003) design-oriented stress-strain model is based on the following assumptions: (i) the stress-strain curve consists of a parabolic first portion and a linear second portion, as illustrated in Fig.”