Genetic influence on caste in the ant Camponotus consobrinus
By Vanessa S. Fraser, Bernard E. Kaufmann, Benjamin P. Oldroyd, Ross H. Crozier. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2000
87 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/33f57635bf5f2d362cd769f2fdb2b97bf4574394
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- T. Schwander
- M. Chapuisat
- E. J. Fjerdingstad
- D. Emlen
- H. Rosset
- K. Hartfelder
- Ross H. Crozier
- Armin P. Moczek
In Genetics
- T. Schwander
- M. Chapuisat
- E. J. Fjerdingstad
- D. Emlen
- H. Rosset
- K. Hartfelder
- Ross H. Crozier
- Armin P. Moczek
In Insect Science
Citations in the corpus
- Endocrine Control of Insect Polyphenism (2012, background): “Such genetic factors (allelic differences between queens and workers) were originally proposed for the slave-making ant Harpagoxenus sublaevis (Winter and Buschinger, 1986), but have recently also been demonstrated for a Camponotus (Fraser et al., 2000), two Pogonomyrmex species (Julian et al.”
- Polyandry in social Hymenoptera — disunity in diversity? (2001, background): “…worker castes (or ‘subcastes’ according to terminological preference), genetical variation in the proportion of these subcastes has been demonstrated between colonies in Pheidole dentata (Johnston & Wilson 1985) and strongly indicated within colonies for Camponotus consobrinus (Fraser et al. 2000).”
- Division of labour and worker size polymorphism in ant colonies: the impact of social and genetic factors (2005, background): “A genetic component to worker size was also found in the ants Camponotus consobrinus (Fraser et al. 2000) and Acromyrmex echinatior (Hughes et al. 2003), but not in Formica truncorum (Bargum et al. 2004), possibly because heritability may vary between years and social contexts (Rüppell et al.…”