Use of a structured investigative protocol enhances the quality of investigative interviews with alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Britain

By M. Lamb, Y. Orbach, K. J. Sternberg, J. Aldridge, Sally Pearson, H. Stewart, Phillip W. Esplin, L. Bowler. 2009

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evaluation of a comprehensive interactive training system for investigative interviewers of children (2015, background): “Summary Providing a structured protocol is critical for the success of any reform that aims to improve investigative interviewing of child witnesses (Cyr & Lamb, 2007; Lamb et al., 2009; Orbach et al., 2000; Sternberg et al., 2001).”
Expected Consequences of Disclosure Revealed in Investigative Interviews with Suspected Victims of Child Sexual Abuse (2011, background): “…effectiveness in improving the quality of interviewer questions and testimony from children has been demonstrated in numerous field and laboratory studies (Cyr & Lamb, 2008; Lamb et al., 2009; Orbach et al., 2000; Sternberg et al., 2001; see Lamb, Hershkowitz, Orbach, & Esplin, 2008, for a review).”
Does enhanced rapport-building alter the dynamics of investigative interviews with suspected victims of intra-familial abuse? (2013, unknown): “…1999) unless they are trained to use structured interview protocols and have regular follow up meetings to ensure continued compliance with recommended practices (Cyr & Lamb, 2009; Lamb et al., 2009; Lamb, Sternberg, Orbach, Esplin, & Mitchell, 2002; Orbach et al., 2000; Sternberg et al., 2001).”