Towards a Definition of Disentangled Representations

By Irina Higgins, David Amos, David Pfau, Sébastien Racanière, Loic Matthey, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Alexander Lerchner. 2018

546 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How can intelligent agents solve a diverse set of tasks in a data-efficient manner? The disentangled representation learning approach posits that such an agent would benefit from separating out (disentangling) the underlying structure of the world into disjoint parts of its representation. However, there is no generally agreed-upon definition of disentangling, not least because it is unclear how to formalise the notion of world structure beyond toy datasets with a known ground truth generative process. Here we propose that a principled solution to characterising disentangled representations can be found by focusing on the transformation properties of the world. In particular, we suggest that those transformations that change only some properties of the underlying world state, while leaving all other properties invariant, are what gives exploitable structure to any kind of data. Similar ideas have already been successfully applied in physics, where the study of symmetry transformations has revolutionised the understanding of the world structure. By connecting symmetry transformations to vector representations using the formalism of group and representation theory we arrive at the first formal definition of disentangled representations. Our new definition is in agreement with many of the current intuitions about disentangling, while also providing principled resolutions to a number of previous points of contention. While this work focuses on formally defining disentangling - as opposed to solving the learning problem - we believe that the shift in perspective to studying data transformations can stimulate the development of better representation learning algorithms.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Representation & Self-Supervised Learning

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Dacheng Tao
  3. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  4. Trevor Darrell
  5. Jitendra Malik
  6. Xiaogang Wang
  7. Andrea Vedaldi
  8. Andrew Zisserman

In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning

  1. Bernhard Schölkopf
  2. Francesco Locatello
  3. Stefan Bauer
  4. Olivier Bachem
  5. J. Urgen Schmidhuber
  6. Sjoerd van Steenkiste
  7. Yoshua Bengio
  8. Michael Tschannen

Citations in the corpus