Systems biology informed deep learning for inferring parameters and hidden dynamics
By Alireza Yazdani, Lu Lu, Maizar Raissi, G. Em Karniadakis. bioRxiv, 2019
339 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Mathematical models of biological reactions at the system-level lead to a set of ordinary differential equations with many unknown parameters that need to be inferred using relatively few experimental measurements. Having a reliable and robust algorithm for parameter inference and prediction of the hidden dynamics has been one of the core subjects in systems biology, and is the focus of this study. We have developed a new systems-biology-informed deep learning algorithm that incorporates the system of ordinary differential equations into the neural networks. Enforcing these equations effectively adds constraints to the optimization procedure that manifests itself as an imposed structure on the observational data. Using few scattered and noisy measurements, we are able to infer the dynamics of unobserved species, external forcing, and the unknown model parameters. We have successfully tested the algorithm for three different benchmark problems. Author summary The dynamics of systems biological processes are usually modeled using ordinary differential equations (ODEs), which introduce various unknown parameters that need to be estimated efficiently from noisy measurements of concentration for a few species only. In this work, we present a new “systems-informed neural network” to infer the dynamics of experimentally unobserved species as well as the unknown parameters in the system of equations. By incorporating the system of ODEs into the neural networks, we effectively add constraints to the optimization algorithm, which makes the method robust to noisy and sparse measurements.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/33da5e93b3c9c02256c6a98f8a843ae62e27d436
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- G. Em Karniadakis
- Paris Perdikaris
- Xuhui Meng
- Lu Lu
- Zhiping Mao
- Shengze Cai
- Sifan Wang
- Michael S. Steinbach
In Molecular Biology
- Lu Lu
- Xuhui Meng
- G. Em Karniadakis
- Michael S. Steinbach
- Vipin Kumar
- Paris Perdikaris
- Xiaowei Jia
- Shaoming Xu
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Citations in the corpus
- On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networks (2020, background): “PINNs in particular, have demonstrated remarkable power in applications including fluid dynamics [12, 13, 14], biomedical engineering [15, 16, 17], meta-material design [18, 19], free boundary problems [20], Bayesian networks and uncertainty quantification [21, 22], high dimensional PDEs [23, 24, 25”
- Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problems (2021, methodology): “PINNs have been successfully employed to solve diverse problems in different fields, for example in optics [7, 8], fluid mechanics [9], systems biology [10], and biomedicine [11].”
- Integrating Scientific Knowledge with Machine Learning for Engineering and Environmental Systems (2020, background): “1) [266] [10] [219] [158] [140] [182] [203] [76] [86] [130] [174] [204] [231] [313] [121] [125] [187] [92] [306] [180] [298] [184] [267] [39] [247] [133] [130] [231] [298] [173] [66] [24] [255] [12] [17] [203] [204] [213] [239] [125] [281] [214] [176] [249] [310] [309] [311] [245] [78] [266] [297] [”
- Integrating Physics-Based Modeling with Machine Learning: A Survey (2020, background): “…earth systems [214], climate science [75, 135, 186], turbulence modeling [28, 179, 273], material discovery [40, 202, 226], quantum chemistry [222, 228], biological sciences [285], and hydrology [275]), and it is being performed in the context of diverse objectives specific to these applications.”
- MIONet: Learning multiple-input operators via tensor product (2022, methodology): “These methods have shown promising results in diverse applications, such as fluid mechanics [38], optics [4], systems biology [44, 5], and biomedicine [14].”
- A comprehensive and fair comparison of two neural operators (with practical extensions) based on FAIR data (2021, methodology): “1B), which was originally proposed and used in PINNs [48, 13].”
- A comprehensive study of non-adaptive and residual-based adaptive sampling for physics-informed neural networks (2022, methodology): “PINNs have been applied to tackle diverse problems in computational science and engineering, such as inverse problems in nano-optics, metamaterials [5], and fluid dynamics [2], parameter estimation in systems biology [6, 7], and problems of inverse design and topology optimization [8].”