Deception as a Derived Function of Language

By Nathan Oesch. 2016

20 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Language may be one of most important attributes which separates humans from other animal species. It has been suggested by some commentators that the primary biological function of human language is to deceive and selfishly manipulate social competitors. However, despite the existence of a large body of relevant theoretical and empirical literature in favor of the social bonding hypothesis for language function, the ostensible evidence and arguments for the deception hypothesis have not been fully discussed. The following review analyses the evidence and theoretical arguments from human social behavior, comparative animal behavior, and developmental psychology and suggests that deception shows clear signs of a derived function for language. Furthermore, in addition to being used relatively infrequently across most human and non-human animal contexts, deception appears to be utilized just as often for prosocial and social bonding functions, as it is for antisocial purposes. Future studies should focus on theoretical and experimental investigations which explore interactions between deceptive and honest language use in the context of social bonding.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Linguistics

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Iason Gabriel
2. Tom Everitt

In Social Psychology

1. Iason Gabriel
2. Vladimir Mikulik
3. Tom Everitt
4. Geoffrey Irving
5. Zachary Kenton
6. Laura Weidinger

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Iason Gabriel
2. Vladimir Mikulik
3. Tom Everitt

Citations in the corpus

• Alignment of Language Agents (2021, background): “Oesch (2016) reviews the field, and argues that a combination of deceptive and honest language lead to the social bonding effects of language.”