A Systematic Review of the Religiosity and Delinquency Literature
By Byron R. Johnson, Spencer De Li, D. Larson, M. McCullough. 2000
307 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Epidemiology, Health, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/33cec8ea7c81b3f20670bce3cfaabb3aeba69735
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Epidemiology
In Health
- Byron R. Johnson
- S. Jang
- P. Kelly
- J. Polanin
- Dan Ariely
- Michael I. Norton
- Daniel Mochon
- David P. Farrington
In Sociology and Political Science
- David P. Farrington
- S. Jang
- Byron R. Johnson
- J. Polanin
- Brandon C. Welsh
- P. Kelly
- Ramendra Singh
- Dan Ariely
Citations in the corpus
- Who Benefits from Religion? (2011, background): “…societal level, higher religious involvement is related to increased levels of education (Gruber 2005), lower crime rates (Baier and Wright 2001; Johnson et al. 2000), increases in civic involvement (Putnam 2000; Ruiter and De Graaf 2006), higher levels of cooperation (Norenzayan and Shariff…”
- Improved street lighting and crime prevention (2002, background): “It is beyond the scope of this article to discuss all the features of systematic reviews, but interested readers should consult key reports on the topic (see, e.g., Farr ington & Petrosino, 2000; Farrington & Welsh, 2001; Johnson et al., 2000).”
- Religiosity and consumer behavior: a summarizing review (2019, background): “Review articles about religiosity have dealt with its relationship to outcomes like health (Seeman, Dubin, and Seeman 2003), sexual behavior (Rostosky et al. 2004), delinquency (Johnson et al. 2000), and ethics (Vitell 2009).”
- Religion, Delinquency, and Drug Use (2015, methodology): “…because they are more attached to their parents, more committed to educational goals, more conventional in moral beliefs, and less likely to have delinquent or drug-using friends than their nonreligious peers (Jang & Johnson, 2001; Johnson et al., 2001; Johnson et al., 2000a; Regnerus, 2003).”