Comparative modeling for protein structure prediction.

By Krzysztof Ginalski. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 2006

304 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Memoir: template-based structure prediction for membrane proteins (2013, unknown): “The main source of error in homology models is inaccuracies in the target–template alignment (18).”
Reconstruction of Protein Backbones from the BriX Collection of Canonical Protein Fragments (2008, methodology): “this coverage using related proteins with known structures to build a model [2–5].”
Protein structure modeling with MODELLER. (2014, methodology): “Comparative modeling relies on structural information from related proteins to guide the modeling procedure(6-8).”
Computational prediction of secondary and supersecondary structures. (2013, background): “5 million nonredundant protein sequences in the RefSeq database (5), and the fact that experimental determination of protein structure is relatively expensive and time-consuming and cannot keep up with the rapid accumulation of the sequence data (6-9).”
Template-based structure modeling of protein-protein interactions (2013, methodology): “Many variations and advanced methods have been developed for TBM [15,16], and it has been highly successful for protein tertiary structure modeling [17].”