Building better science-policy interfaces for international environmental governance: assessing potential within the Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

By Thomas Koetz, K. Farrell, P. Bridgewater. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2012

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/33beed04189f90334ad719edf8ee0a08269a137d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Christoph Görg
2. M. Hulme
3. Josef Settele
4. Eleftheria Vasileiadou
5. Eva Lövbrand
6. S. Dessai

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Christoph Görg
2. E. Turnhout
3. Elisa de Lijster
4. M. Hulme
5. Josef Settele
6. Eleftheria Vasileiadou
7. Eva Lövbrand
8. K. Neves

Citations in the corpus

• ‘Measurementality’ in Biodiversity Governance: Knowledge, Transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Ipbes) (2014, background): “Global, standardized scientific knowledge that is unable to take up local perspectives and knowledge is likely to be detached from localized action (Beck, 2011; Hulme et al, 2011; Koetz et al, 2012).”
• Towards a Reflexive Turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise. The Cases of the IPCC and the IPBES. (2014, methodology): “…broad and inclusive: for instance, the IPBES agenda has not been restricted to procedures and management structures, as was the case with the IPCC reform agenda, but has included a thorough gap analysis of information needs and the explicit involvement of stakeholders (Koetz et al. 2012).”