Clustering Rules: A Comparison of Partitioning and Hierarchical Clustering Algorithms
By Alan P. Reynolds, Graeme Richards, Beatriz de la Iglesia, Victor J. Rayward-Smith. J. Math. Model. Algorithms, 2006
568 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Signal Processing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/33afcf296141e43586790158c5f52bbcfb799b81
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Rob Knight
- Amanda Birmingham
- Antonio Gonzalez
- Yoshiki Vazquez-Baeza
- Zhenjiang Xu
- Catherine A. Lozupone
- Sophie J. Weiss
- Peter Markewitz
In Information Systems
In Signal Processing
Citations in the corpus
- Impact of different time series aggregation methods on optimal energy system design (2017, methodology): “[32] use a greedy optimization algorithm called Partitioning Around Medoids (PAM) [40], the problem can also be stated as a Mixed-Integer Linear Program (MILP) [33, 35], for which good global solving algorithms exist.”
- Waste Not, Want Not: Why Rarefying Microbiome Data Is Inadmissible (2013, methodology): “…Euclidean PoissonDist top - MSD UniFrac - u UniFrac - w ll l l l l l ll l l l l l ll l l l l l ll l l l l l ll l l l l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l 0.6 0.8 [50,51] clustering accuracy (vertical axis) that results following different normalization and distance methods.”
- Normalization and microbial differential abundance strategies depend upon data characteristics (2017, methodology): “methods by the proportion of samples correctly classified into the two clusters by the partitioning around medioids (PAM) algorithm [73, 74].”