Sustainability and the measurement of wealth

By Kenneth J. Arrow, Partha Dasgupta, L. Goulder, Kevin J. Mumford, Kirsten Oleson. 2012

618 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Natural Capital: From Metaphor to Measurement (2014, methodology): “Valuing the entire stock at this marginal price implies a total stock capitalization or the component of “comprehensive wealth” (Arrow et al. 2012) attributable to the stock of between $265.”
Economic Growth and Sustainable Development in Indonesia: An Assessment (2018, methodology): “…as the following: dV K t dt dV K t K t dK t dt p t dK t dti i i i i i � (5) Sustainable development in the wealth framework is represented by nondecreasing inclusive wealth, if well-being converges with an economic prediction at t and is a differentiable function at K t (Arrow et al. 2012).”
Inclusive Wealth Report 2018 (2018, background): “Of course, one can think of TFP as another capital asset (Arrow et al. 2012).”
Achieving sustainable development goals: predicaments and strategies (2019, background): “This measure is, however, severely limited by cross-country, timeseries data availability (Arrow et al. 2012; Dasgupta 2013).”
The sustainable development oxymoron: quantifying and modelling the incompatibility of sustainable development goals (2016, neutral): “Arrow et al. (2012), for instance, use time itself in their models on sustainable development to account for effects of time-varying factors such as technological change or new trends and normative changes.”
National Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Assets and Their Services (2015, background): “Using this approach to valuation leads to a measure of wealth that is the sum of all assets measured at their shadow prices (Arrow et al. 2012; Dasgupta 2009; UNU-IHDP 2014).”
Insight, part of a Special Feature on Ecosystem Service Trade-offs across Global Contexts and Scales A sustainability framework for assessing trade-offs in ecosystem services (2015, background): “…of what services can be provided in the future as a function of the amounts of manufactured, human, social, and natural capital that the current generation leaves for future generations (Hamilton and Clemens 1999, Dasgupta and Mäler 2000, Heal 2000, Arrow et al. 2004, Arrow et al. 2012).”