Transderivational Identity: Phonological Relations Between Words

By Laura Benua. 2008

384 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3398306d1130d307208022a54db79ba9075dad10

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Positional Faithfulness, Non-locality, and the Harmonic Serialism Solution (2011, background): “…syllabified as an onset, this initial syllabification will ensure that its [+voice] feature is preserved in the output even if the segment is subsequently resyllabified as a coda due to affixation, truncation, syncope, or some other process (see Benua 1997 and Wilson 2001 for relevant discussion).”
Stochastic phonological knowledge: the case of Hungarian vowel harmony (2006, background): “The overall tendency for a stem to take the same backness of suffixes throughout its paradigm would best be attributed to output-to-output correspondence constraints (Benua 1997) governing suffix backness, though we will not attempt to flesh out this proposal here.”
Fenno-Swedish Quantity: Contrast in Stratal OT (2006, background): “Parallel OT has two devices at its disposal for dealing with opacity: Base/Output (Output/Output) constraints(Benua 1997), andSympathy(with or without Cumulativity, McCarthy 1999a, 1999b).”
Morphological effects on the darkness of English intervocalic /l/ (2013, background): “…morpheme boundary differs from the other two environments, i.e. non-productive boundary or monomorphemic forms, in that there is a free-standing morpheme (kneel) which can exert morphophonological pressure such as paradigm uniformity (e.g., Benua 1997, Steriade 2000, Burzio 2005, Hall 2005).”
Half rhymes in Japanese rap lyrics and knowledge of similarity (2007, background): “Paradigm uniformity: Morphologically related words are required to be as similar as possible both phonologically ( Benua 1997 ) and phonetically (Steriade 2000; Yu 2006; Zuraw 2005).”
Lexical irregularity and the typology of contrast (2006, background): “Alternatively, we may assume surface allomorphy to be checked by special constraints maximizing the phonological similarity between members of a paradigm—OO-Faithfulness constraints (Burzio 1996, Benua 1997 ).”