Dual Decomposition Inference for Graphical Models over Strings
By Nanyun Peng, Ryan Cotterell, Jason Eisner. 2015
7 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We investigate dual decomposition for joint MAP inference of many strings. Given an arbitrary graphical model, we decompose it into small acyclic sub-models, whose MAP configurations can be found by finite-state composition and dynamic programming. We force the solutions of these subproblems to agree on overlapping variables, by tuning Lagrange multipliers for an adaptively expanding set of variable-lengthn-gram count features. This is the first inference method for arbitrary graphical models over strings that does not require approximations such as random sampling, message simplification, or a bound on string length. Provided that the inference method terminates, it gives a certificate of global optimality (though MAP inference in our setting is undecidable in general). On our global phonological inference problems, it always terminates, and achieves more accurate results than max-product and sum-product loopy belief propagation.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Natural Language Processing, Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Kai-Wei Chang
- Jieyu Zhao
- Tianlu Wang
- Vicente Ordonez
- Mark Yatskar
- Mohit Bansal
- Yulia Tsvetkov
- Adina Williams
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Natural Language Processing
- Kai-Wei Chang
- Jieyu Zhao
- Tianlu Wang
- Vicente Ordonez
- Mark Yatskar
- Nanyun Peng
- Yejin Choi
- Adina Williams
In Probabilistic & Bayesian Methods
Citations in the corpus
- Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraints (2017, methodology): “Lagrangian relaxation and dual decomposition techniques have been widely used in NLP tasks (e.g., (Sontag et al., 2011; Rush and Collins, 2012; Chang and Collins, 2011; Peng et al., 2015)) for dealing with instance-level constraints.”