Hearing in time: Psychological aspects of musical meter.

By A. Penel. 2006

240 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3380ff39e539f6dab3bcbbcabf0c369b02420bb0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. J. Devin McAuley
2. Joel S. Snyder
3. Edward W. Large
4. Erin E. Hannon
5. Morten H. Christiansen
6. David J. Lewkowicz
7. Martin Clayton
8. Henkjan Honing

Citations in the corpus

• Synchronization and Continuation Tapping to Complex Meters (2006, background): “…ELECTRONIC ISSN 1533-8312 © 2006 should fall within the temporal range that is optimal for temporal perception and production (200–1200 ms, Engström, Kelso, & Holroyd, 1996; Friberg & Sundberg, 1995; London, 2004; Mates, Müller, Radil, & Pöppel, 1994; Parncutt, 1994; Van Noorden & Moelants, 1999).”
• Testing a Computational Model of Rhythm Perception Using Polyrhythmic Stimuli (2013, unknown): “(e) Connectivity of oscillators and number of net- works.”
• Tagging the Neuronal Entrainment to Beat and Meter (2011, unknown): “periodic modulation of loudness, melodic or harmonic accents, or timbre variations (Drake et al., 2000; London, 2004).”
• Tempo and Rhythm (2010, background): “A conservative estimate for the upper (fast) tempo limit is around 100 ms between sounds (Friberg and Sundström 2002; London 2004), while an estimate for the lower (slow) tempo limit is around 2.”