What is new in coccolithophore biology

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Ribosomal DNA phylogenies and a morphological revision provide the basis for a revised taxonomy of the Prymnesiales (Haptophyta) (2011, background): “The microtubular root R2, with its origin between the two basal bodies, is simple and comprises a few microtubules in all species examined so far (Billard & Inouye, 2004).”
A review of selected aspects of coccolithophore biology with implications for paleobiodiversity estimation (2005, background): “…this work it is now clear that many haptophytes have haplo-diplontic life-cycles (Plate 1), i.e. with both the haploid and diploid phases being represented by vegetative stages, and that this is the ancestral state for coccolithophores (Billard 1994; Houdan et al. 2004; Billard and Inouye 2004).”
The life cycle of Phaeocystis: state of knowledge and presumptive role in ecology (2007, background): “diploid generations, each capable of independent asexual reproduction (Billard 1994; Edvardsen 2002; Billard and Inouye 2004; Houdan et al. 2004).”
On the description of Tisochrysis lutea gen. nov. sp. nov. and Isochrysis nuda sp. nov. in the Isochrysidales, and the transfer of Dicrateria to the Prymnesiales (Haptophyta) (2013, background): “They also possess relatively simple flagellar roots, a reduced haptonema and organic scales with a unique ornamentation (Billard and Inouye 2004).”