Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of stream sediments with comparison to terrestrial soils
By R. Sinsabaugh, J. F. Follstad Shah, B. Hill, C. Elonen. Biogeochemistry, 2011
102 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/33442c03a934a466e8a6ce823f81f1f1ee0077d9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- R. Sinsabaugh
- J. F. Follstad Shah
- D. Moorhead
- M. Weintraub
- M. Wallenstein
- B. Hill
- M. Stromberger
- Colin W. Bell
In Environmental Chemistry
In Soil Science
- R. Sinsabaugh
- J. F. Follstad Shah
- D. Moorhead
- M. Weintraub
- M. Wallenstein
- B. Hill
- M. Stromberger
- C. Kuske
Citations in the corpus
- Extracellular enzyme kinetics scale with resource availability (2014, background): “Paralleling the trend for bulk elemental abundance, the scaling exponents for the most widely assayed C, N and P-acquiring extracellular enzyme activities (EEA) are also near 1.0 (Sinsabaugh et al. 2008, 2009, 2012).”
- Extracellular enzymes in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments: perspectives on system variability and common research needs (2013, background): “N acquiring) have slopes near 1.0 (range 0.85–1.27), but with activity ratios that vary with elemental composition of available organic matter (Sinsabaugh et al. 2008, 2010, 2012).”
- Ecoenzymatic Stoichiometry and Ecological Theory (2012, methodology): “In soils, the mining of humus for polysaccharide and polypeptide C and N may lead to a positive correlation between oxidative and hydrolytic enzyme activities, but more commonly these activities are uncorrelated (Sinsabaugh 2010, Sinsabaugh & Follstad Shah 2011, Sinsabaugh et al. 2011).”