In situ produced 10Be measurements at great depths: implications for production rates by fast muons
By R. Braucher, E. Brown, D. Bourlès, F. Colin. 2003
201 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Geophysics, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3330f90fef3224e9118c268f4b284af2071b1a70
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Geophysics
In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Citations in the corpus
- CosmoCalc: An Excel add‐in for cosmogenic nuclide calculations (2007, background): “Schaller et al. [2002] use not four but eight exponentials (two for neutrons, and three for each slow and fast muons), whereas others use three (one for each production mechanism) [e.g., Braucher et al., 2003; Miller et al., 2006] or only one exponential (neglecting muon production).”
- Production rate calculations for cosmic-ray-muon-produced 10Be and 26Al benchmarked against geological calibration data (2017, background): “Cuiaba 707 At Cuiaba, Braucher et al. (2003) collected samples from two sites: a deep open- 708 pit excavation where the original soil surface was not present and the amount of pre- 709 stripping prior to excavation was not exactly known; and a second site, in a different 710 location from the main…”