The Solow model with CES technology: nonlinearities and parameter heterogeneity
By Winford H. Masanjala, C. Papageorgiou. 2004
185 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/332c515f52dc40e8db70d6c77b4b586d90671130
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- S. Bentolila
- G. Saint‐Paul
- Fulvio Castellacci
- P. Pedroni
- Olimpia Neagu
- Mehdi Ben Jebli
- Joakim Westerlund
- Slim Ben Youssef
Citations in the corpus
- The technology clubs: the distribution of knowledge across nations (2008, background): “…of codified knowledge).18 The results of the estimations are presented in Table 4a (for the year 1990) and Table 4b (for the year 2000).19 16 For instance, Masanjala and Papageorgiou (2004) have shown that, by simply changing the functional form of the Cobb-Douglas specification of the growth…”
- The Normalized CES Production Function: Theory and Empirics (2011, unknown): “It was shown by Paroush (1964), Yasui (1965) and McElroy (1967) that the rather narrow assumption of Allen’s theorem is not essential for the derivation of the CES production function which can start directly from the original Hicks definition (2).”
- Social capital, barriers to production and capital shares: implications for the importance of parameter heterogeneity from a nonstationary panel approach (2007, background): “Many researchers, including Bernard and Jones (1996), Durlauf and Johnson (1995), Caselli, Esquivel and Lefort (1996), Lee, Pesaran and Smith (1997) (1998) and Masanjala and Papageorgiou (2004) have noted that, empirically, capital factors shares appear to vary considerably across countries.”
- Explaining Movements in the Labor Share (2003, background): “…Papageorgiou and coauthors, who also use a CES production and capture technological progress through trends, provide many estimates, most of which are above 1 (e.g. –without including measures for human capital– 1.54 in Masanjala and Papageorgiou, 2003, or 1.24 in Du y and Papageorgiou, 2000).”